Home About CEC Team Systems Technology Links
Site Map Auto HEV Systems Energy Defense GCV Hybrid System Contact
Home CHP Solar Hybrid Energy Distributed Energy High Alt Power Tactical Quiet Generators Jet Engines

 

 

Solar Energy Conversion

The CEC Hybrid Solar/Combustion turbine power conversion system ("PCS") utilizes state-of-the-art, high efficiency gas turbine hardware operating in an externally heated closed loop Brayton cycle. This unique operating system dramatically improves concentrated solar heat power systems by making available both the intrinsic durability of turbo machinery and the improved operating efficiency of the Brayton cycle.
The CEC PCS is designed to operate with a solar array such as the SAIC SunDish, which is capable of concentrating 125 kW of solar energy in an 8" diameter aperture.

For the SunDish and similar applications CEC has also designed a solar receiver that further utilizes an integrated auxiliary gas-fired combustor.

 This concentric combustor surrounds the annular air passage of the working fluid (air) in its closed Brayton cycle. At full solar strength, without combustion augmentation, this two-stage turbo generator can produce an electrical output of up to 40 kW (equal to a 39% engine thermal efficiency).

The systems output can be augmented by the auxiliary gas combustor to produce up to 60 kW of electrical power. Utilization of the auxiliary combustor and closed Brayton cycle design make it possible for the turbo generator to operate efficiently over a full range of power conditions regardless of solar incidence.      

Environmental Impact:

In an exclusive solar mode, the system has no emissions. In mixed or non-solar mode the use of very low intensity external surface combustion methods maintains nitrous oxide emission levels below 2 parts per million, and since the system operates at over 40% thermal efficiency over a wide load range, CO2  emissions per kilowatt of electrical output are a very small fraction of what equivalent conventional power plants would yield.

Prospective Availability Improvements

The same fundamental reasons that gas turbines brought new dimensions to aircraft availability apply to the application of dynamic machines to Solar Power Conversion Systems. Radial piston aircraft engines had overhaul lives of 1,000 to 1,600 hours. In contrast, jet propulsion engines routinely go 10,000 hours between overhauls.

3,000 rpm internal combustion engines driving stationary generators have overhaul lives of 10,000 hours, and slow-speed diesel generator engines can go as high as 15,000 to 16,000 hours.

Gas turbine generators weigh much less and offer significantly longer lives between overhauls Many stationary gas turbine installations have operated continuously for well over 75,000 hours without overhaul. In rugged applications  such as off road heavy equipment the turbo chargers have outlasted the diesel engines by several overhaul cycles.

Reliability Rationale:

In the piston engine era in-flight failures were so common as to require at least four engines for trans-ocean passenger flights. Current civil transport jets require only two engines for the same flights.

Stationary power plants are almost universally turbine-driven. Small generator sets will follow the same trend as micro turbines as represented by Capstone begin routinely to log 25,000 hours and more without unscheduled service interruptions.

Stirling Cycle Engines:

Solar PCS applications heavily favor externally heated engine cycles to permit the use of open receivers without quartz window losses. This brings the competition down to a choice between Stirling cycle reciprocating engines and closed loop Brayton cycle gas turbines. There is abundant evidence of excellent reliability being achieved by small Stirling cycle engines that use flexures instead of piston displacement in space applications. Few Stirling engine manufacturers publish durability data. There is mention in the literature of a V160 Stirling engine driving a 6.5 kilowatt generator at 1,800-rpm for which a life of 5,000 hours is claimed. It is generally acknowledged that the four-cylinder Stirling engines used so far in solar dish applications are prone to mechanical problems.

Gas Turbine Systems:

The same turbo machines to be used in the CEC Solar PCS have been used by Ballard Generating Systems in a 250 kW, stationary, fuel cell with a design overhaul life of over 9,000 hours (one year). These rugged turbochargers are designed such that only the bearings and seal need replacement. By utilizing components fabricated from inconel, titanium and stainless steel alloy these units have a design service life of over 10 years. Currently Ballard is working towards a goal of operating 15 complete field test systems without a shutdown for one year.

The first of the 15 Ballard systems has completed its field trials successfully after several years of uninterrupted operation. The turbo chargers were returned for teardown examination, as shown in the adjacent photograph. Both low- and high-pressure spools were found to be in excellent condition except for the normal buildup of varnish in the bearing seals, which would not have inhibited continued operation.

The CEC system has been demonstrated in laboratory tests using variable high pressure turbine backpressure to simulate the turbo generator load, and screens on the low pressure compressor inlet to verify sub-atmospheric performance.

 

 

Economic Viability

In a 1999 study for the DOE, Arthur D. Little arrived at the following projection of CPS economics based on the use of Stirling engines in various future time periods:

1999 Arthur D. Little Study for DOE

   Performance and cost indicators. 

NAME INDICATOR

 

UNITS

1980's Prototype

Hybrid System

Commercial Engine

Heat Pipe Receiver

Higher Production

Higher Production

COE = CR x Capital Cost        +     O&M

               Annual output (kWh)

CR  “capital recovery factor” takes into account interest on dept, equipment depreciation, return on investment, insurance, and tax

CR = 0.16 corresponds to common commercial terms as exemplified by private developers and merchant power plants

 

1999 Centrally Generated U.S. Power Costs

Cost Component

Cost - ˘/kW-Hr

 

Low

High

Power Plant Capital Recovery

1.5

2.0

Power Generation Cost

2.0

3.5

Distribution Cost

1.4

1.5

Total Cost

4.9

7.0

The cost of energy projected by the

As will be seen, the study figures after 2010 compare favorably with average U.S. power generation costs in 1999 dollars.

To the study's cost of energy must be added the cost of fuel for the hybrid portion of operations and about $1.5 for transmitting and distributing the power.

Assuming the use of natural gas and an engine thermal efficiency of 40%, the fuel costs would be about $1.25 per kilowatt hour of hybrid operation.

This places the 2005 figures still above the competitive economic range.

     

 

 

 

 

1997

2000

2005

2010

2020

2030

Typical Plant Size

MW

.025

1

30

30

30

30

Performance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capacity Factor

%

  12.4

50

50

50

50

50

Solar Fraction

%

100

50

50

50

50

50

Dish module rating

kW

  25.0

25.0

25.0

27.5

27.5

27.5

Power Prod./ Dish

MWh/yr/dish

 27.4

109.6

109.6

120.6

120.6

120.6

Capital Cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Concentrator

$/kW

 4,200

2,800

1,550

   500

  400

  300

  Receiver

 $/kW

200

   120

     80

     90

    80

    70

  Hybrid

 

----

   500

   400

   325

  270

  250

  Engine

 

5,500

   800

   260

   100

    90

    90

  Generator

 

60

     50

     45

     40

    40

    40

  Cooling System

 

70

     65

     40

     30

    30

    30

  Electrical

 

50

     45

     35

     25

    25

     5

PCS

 $/kW

5,880

1,580

860

610

535

505

Balance of Plant

 

500

   425

   300

   250

  240

  240

Subtotal (A)

 

10,580

4,805

2,710

1,360

1,175

1,045

Genl Plant Fac.(B)

 

220

   190

   150

125

110

110

Eng. Fee, 0.1*(A+B)

1,080

   500

286

149

  128

  115

Total Plant Cost

 $/kW

11,880

5,495

3,146

1,634

1,413

1,270

Prepaid Royalties

         0

       0

      0

      0

      0

      0

Init Cat & Chem. Inventory

120

60

12

6

6

6

Startup Costs

 

350

     70

    35

    20

    18

    18

Other

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

Inventory Capital

 200

     40

    12

      4

      4

      4

Land, @$16,250/ha

26

26

    26

     26

    26

    26

Subtotal

 

696

196

85

56

54

    54

Total Capital

$/kW

12,576

5,691

3,231

1,690

1,467

1,324

Capital w/o Hybrid

12,576

5,191

2,831

1,365

1,197

1,074

Operation and Maintenance Cost

 

 

 

 

 

Labor

˘/kWh

12.00

2.10

1.20